Talk:Cahora Bassa (HVDC)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Cahora Bassa was operational trhought the Mozambican civil war, I am a mzambican and I know that, the article says it was not operational. That was one of the key infrastructure the Goverment protectd heavilly including placing land mines around the poles197.249.228.160 (talk) 09:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The papers cited in the article say 2000 towers were damanged and that transmission stopped in 1985. A citation of a document stating the contrary would be required. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P=V·I?[edit]

the article reads

The HVDC-power line from Cabora-Bassa is a symmetric HVDC, which can transmit 1920 megawatts at a voltage level of 533 kilovolts and 1800 amperes.

Do the math, 533k*1800=~960M Or am I missing something? VdSV9 14:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably +/- 533 kV - double the line-to-line voltage but each pole only withstands 533 kV to earth. --Wtshymanski 02:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good one, thanks. :) VdSV9


Yes, that is the case. The system has two monopolar and (almost) independent lines; each of them can operate at +/-533KV at 1800A. Each line can carry up to 960MW. Usually they are operated at symmetric volatges in order to reduce the current and subsequent corrosion effects in the earth electrode; but at least in theory they can be both operated at positive or negative voltages (altough not at full power, since the earth electrode would not withstand the full 3600A that would arise in this case).

Conversions to US units[edit]

I looked around for some kind of Wikipedia style guide on doing this and couldn't quickly find one, so I just followed the style that seems to be common in wire service (AP, Reuters, etc) articles.

68.13.240.14 (talk) 09:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cahora Bassa (HVDC). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]