Talk:Cahill–Keyes projection
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comparison with dymaxion[edit]
I have deleted this entire section. It’s riddled with WP:OR, WP:POV, WP:COI, and WP:RELIABILITY. Reliable sources do not compare projections using rhetorical arguments. They use rigorous data. Most of the “problems” this table lists have not even demonstrated to be problems, let alone that the described projection improves on any of them. The very choice of the dymaxion to compare against is mysterious, unsupportable, and lacks any precedent in the literature. The links in the External Links section are also violations of WP:OR, WP:RELIABILITY, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:COI. The article itself is dubious; it seems to be a venue for the projection author’s hobby rather than describing anything that meets the standards of WP:NOTABILITY. Strebe (talk) 04:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)