Talk:Caerleon Urban District

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I know Vision of Britain has Christchurch CP being part of Caerleon UD from 1894 but this [1] puts it in Magor RD. The census tables in VoB are inconsistent, giving the area of Caerleon Ud as identical to Caerleon CP, with Christchurch CP listed also. Did the residue of Christchurch CP pass to Caerleon UD in 1935? Lozleader 20:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. That archives link states that "Magor RDC was abolished in 1935 and was mostly absorbed by the new Magor and St Mellons RDC". Although there was a Newport [Monmouthshire] Extension Act (24 & 25 Geo. 5 c. lvii) in 1934 which may have accounted for the rest. Owain (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caerleon Urban District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310203631/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10067303&c_id=10001043 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10067303&c_id=10001043

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]