Talk:Caecilia gens

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Metelli[edit]

I'm linking here a discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintus Caecilius Metellus (tribune)) in which 'Llywrch' outlines some possible extra Metelli as of yet unmentioned in this page. Avis11 (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[Transclusion of discussion from Talk:Caecilius Metellus]:

Formal request has been received to merge: Caecilii Metelli family tree into Caecilius Metellus; dated: September 30, 2020. Proposer's Rationale: Same information / redundant. Discuss here. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 21:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The other way around: this current page needs to be redirected to the family tree. ~~But before that, all individuals listed herein need to be sorted properly, as some do not have any sources and are of questionable existence even.~~ Avis11 (talk) 21:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorting done, only individual of questionable authenticity already nominated for deletion. Avis11 (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would remove Caecilius Metellus. It is redundant with Caecilia gens. Outdated too. T8612 (talk) 23:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I oppose all these proposals. I think the family tree should be moved to a template instead and this page remade into a prosopographical list, set index or disambiguation page of men in the family.★Trekker (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Caecilius Metellus and Caecilii Metelli family tree to Caecilia gens (or make Caecilius Metellus a disambiguation page), merge all substantial content to Caecilia gens and put the family tree itself in a suitably useful format on that page. A synthesis of the proposals above. GPinkerton (talk) 18:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]