Talk:British Rail Classes 101 and 102

Trains: in UK / in Scotland / Passenger trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks references.

Longest lived?[edit]

I'm just wondering if it's right to call the 101s the longest lived first generation DMUs when there are two class 121s still in main line service? Tom walker (talk) 20:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --No qwach macken (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible change to the title of this article[edit]

This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.

Tables[edit]

This article consists to about three quarters of not too useful order and preservation tables while barely skimming the technical aspects. No qwach macken (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted them all, now it needs expansion/addition of the actually relevant bits...--No qwach macken (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request renaming[edit]

I propose to rename the page to British Rail Class 101 and 102 since both classes fall under this page. Any objections? Nathan A RF (talk) 21:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]