Talk:British Cellophane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"a secondary facility was started at Dalton in Lancashire."

Should that not be @ Barrow-in-Furness, Lancashire ?

I think they probably mean Dalton-in-Furness, Cumbria, which is just to the north of Barrow. Pterre (talk) 14:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BCL Barrow[edit]

The way cellophane was produced in Barrow was different from the techniques used at Bridgwater - as an ex Laboratory Assistant, I well remember much of the detail of how the plant operated, and if memory serves correctly I also recall that one of the sales/marketing ideas in he 1970s hailed the product as being 'biodegradeable' - well ahead of its time. Can the same be truly said of some of its successor packaging materials???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpb2009 (talkcontribs) 19:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.southlakes-uk.co.uk/userreq4/1965BritishCellophane.jpg

86.135.54.241 15:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)BASys No, the factory was indeed in Barrow, at Sandscale, a few employees did live in Dalton-in-Furness, which is to the East of the factory site. Some residents of the area did complain about the smell coming from the plant, when the wind was blowing from he west! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.66.248 (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British Cellophane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]