Talk:Brightman Street Bridge

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poor Pictures[edit]

There don't seem to be any good pictures of this bridge. I speak as one who went there to specifically take such pictures with no particular joy in the results. I may have to go back there and try again, but I welcome advice on how to do a better job this time, as it's a roughly two hour drive each way. I'll get new pictures of the replacement while I'm there, if I do this. I need better light, that I know. Does anyone have a boat on the Taunton River we could use as a platform to get better angles? - Denimadept (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may have some in my archives... will check. Or, I am only 1/2 hour away, if that, so I'll put it on my "to do" list. --Marcbela (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took some new pictures yesterday. I'll likely start scanning the slides tomorrow evening, then see what I've got. - Denimadept (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.srpedd.org/Ch7bridges.pdf reference[edit]

This link no longer works. I noticed when trying to resolve the "ibid" issue. I've currently got an e-mail in to srpedd.org to find out what's happened to the document. - Denimadept (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Closed to all traffic?[edit]

I see the list article now claims this bridge is closed to all traffic. Have they opened it permanently? Is this an official change? Have they now decided to remove the bridge? When will they do it? Source? - Denimadept (talk) 21:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes -Both ends are gated, until they decide what to do, I guess.--Marcbela (talk) 23:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brightman Street Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928055327/http://www.jrcwebexchange.com/shared/frherald/standingproud/html/content/getting/3.htm to http://www.jrcwebexchange.com/shared/frherald/standingproud/html/content/getting/3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]