Talk:Bridgewater Systems

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing: Networking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ottawa Low‑importance

	Ontario portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottawa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottawa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OttawaWikipedia:WikiProject OttawaTemplate:WikiProject OttawaOttawa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled[edit]

Unfortunately there are some reference links broken.

Industry Contributor
I'm looking to create a Dialog on how to appease existing concerns with the Bridgewater Systems wiki. So far I have tried to minimize the 'buzzwords' problem by linking industry jargon to wiki sites that define them.

I am hoping that in order to achieve neutrality, while expanding and editing the article avoiding opinion and sticking to encyclopedic factual references is sufficient. Heard.james (talk) 20:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are welcome, and your aim is sound. Adding Wikilinks to other articles are always a good place to start. I'll post some pointers on your Talk page. When in doubt, you can either post suggestions/comments to the article talk page, or exercise the Bold/Revert/Discuss process. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 20:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am waiting to be confirmed as a user before I can upload the Bridgewater Logo, as it is not allowed in the wiki commons.Heard.james (talk) 14:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit concerned that I already received a system message about how the content I just uploaded to the Bridgewater Systems wiki page may carry a conflict of interest because I - as contributor - work at the company. I don't really know why anyone outside the company would maintain such content anyway, but my real concern is that the last person who wrote content for this page (Heard.James, who was a previous employee) had it torn apart by admin user Tnxman307 for seemingly no reason. I reviewed the changes made by that user and could not disagree more with his opinion that it was too jargony or full of ad copy. There were extremely limited cases of ad copy, and I don't want to waste my time adding this new content only to have it arbitrarily reduced by an admin again. If any admins reading this want to cite specific examples, I'm more than willing to discuss, but I already used a similar telecom company's wiki page as an example of what can/can't be written, so if any of this content is to be removed, then I have a very valid complaint against the holes in the review system because the same changes would have to be made to countless other wiki pages. BWCwiki (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to the admin TeapotGeorge - it was helpful to see specific spots where the apparent conflicts of interest were in question. There were three places where specific citation was requested, and I've addressed 2 of 3 - I don't see anything wrong with the third entry. I welcome another review by that admin to help clarify any remaining issues and to remove the banner across the top of the Bridgewater Systems page that still says we have issues with the content. BWCwiki (talk) 18:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bridgewater Systems. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]