Talk:Break It Off

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Break It Off article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Break It Off has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 2, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rihanna Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Beats per minute#Beats per minute|beats per minute]] The anchor (#Beats per minute) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Artist[edit]

Song is by both of them equally, not just Sean Paul being featured. 71.233.232.196 (talk) 01:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The song charted on Billboard as featuring. Charmed36 (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well then Billboard is wrong. Listen to the song, Sean Paul CLEARLY sings just as much as Rihanna, maybe even more, I might say. 71.233.232.196 (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's what the record label solicited the single as. Charmed36 (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)\[reply]

Then the record label should've listened to it like a million times because Sean Paul CLEARLY sings just as much. 71.233.232.196 (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it's featuring. Check Billboard archives. It remains featuring. Charmed36 (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a link then I'll be convinced. 71.233.232.196 (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. It's "and" I'm sorry. It's just like with Mariah Carey and Boyz II Men "One Sweet Day". Use the word "and". Sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charmed36 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, but look at the COVER ART! The cover art clearly says "featuring", not "&", like Beyonce and Shakira's does. Also, when included on "NOW 24", it was still marked as "featured". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Genevieve-Tamerlaine (talk • contribs) 03:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's reasonable. Charmed36 (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. If it was a duet, the cover art would have said it. Like Mariah Carey and Boyz II Men, Beyonce and Shakira, Jordin Sparks and Chris Brown, Vittorio Grigolo and Nicole Scherzinger and the new songs that Michael Jackson has on his new album. Genevieve-Tamerlaine (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Break It Off/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 0z (talk · contribs) 22:30, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Remove the February 27, 2007 date. Per Template:Infobox single, "This field should refer to the earliest known date".
Removed. AARON• ^TALK

Lead[edit]

It was written by Sean Paul, Donovan Bennett, K. Ford and Rihanna. Production was handled by Don Corleon. → Merge into one sentence
Remove to U.S. Contemporary hit radio station playlists, and later to download digitally internationally on February 27, 2007,
...as a return to the formers roots. → "former's"?
U.S. > US
Maybe mention it peaked at number 10 in the Flanders region of Belgium since the country has two singles charts.
...and it was included on her Good Girl Gone Bad Tour (2007-09),... → and it was included on the set list of her Good Girl Gone Bad Tour (2007-09),
Done all. AARON• ^TALK

Background and release[edit]

link Rihanna
...and Bennett, and it also was mixed by Bennett. → Try and Bennett, who also mixed the song.
Reminiscing on the "Break It Off" and Rihanna, → Remove "the"
U.S. > US
"Contemporary" doesn't need to be capitalized
November 16 > November 13
by the Island Def Jam Music Group. → by Def Jam Recordings.
Done all. AARON• ^TALK 23:13, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics[edit]

Remove , and were provided by Donovan Bennett – Already mentioned in "Background and release"
Removed. AARON• ^TALK 23:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception[edit]

"Break It Off" garnered a response from music critics. → Add "positive" between "a" and "response"
, and compared it to her debut single, "Pon de Replay". – You've already mentioned this in "Composition and lyrics"
Done all. AARON• ^TALK 23:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chart performance[edit]

"Break It Off" climbed into the top 30 songs at... → Remove "songs"
In the first chart issue of Billboard → link Billboard
"Break It Off" debuted on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart → Remove Billboard link and link the word with the Hot 100 link
Done all. AARON• ^TALK 23:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances[edit]

"Break It Off" was included on the set list of Rihanna's Good Girl Gone Bad Tour (2007-09), → Add "also" between "was" and "included"
and was included on the DVD release, → Add "later" between "was" and "included"
Done all. AARON• ^TALK 23:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel[edit]

No issues

Charts[edit]

No issues

Radio adds and release history[edit]

No issues

References[edit]

FN3 – fix date formats (i.e. August 8, 2006. Retrieved December 7, 2011.)
FN4 – fix dashes
FN5 – fix dashes
FN6 – fix dashes
FN7 – fix dashes
FN8 – About.com shouldn't be italicized. Also, fix date format
FN10 – fix date format
FN11 – Author's name is missing
FN13 – fix date format
FN14 – fix date format
FN15 – link Billboard and Prometheus Global Media
FN30 – fix dash
FN31 – fix dash
Done all. AARON• ^TALK 23:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

I've decided to put this article on hold for 7 days. Also, why is there no "Track lising" section? — Oz (talk) 06:45, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Thanks. AARON• ^TALK 23:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passed :) — Oz (talk) 23:37, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. AARON• ^TALK 23:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion[edit]

Just glancing at the article briefly, my biggest concern is the chart performance section. I question if it's necessary to give a blow-by-blow account of every move the song made on every chart. I'd suggest compressing it down some to mention just the peak ranking and date, and the number of weeks total on the charts. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 22:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It only charted in Belgium and two charts in the US. As it charted on two main charts and one component chart, I've given more information about their charting, so that the section isn't one poor sentence long. I believe it is fine the way it is. AARON• ^TALK 23:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of artwork @ Zac[edit]

What do you mean there is no evidence that is the cover? The picture is one of the pictures, like the other single artworks from the album, to be included in the album booklet. It follows the same text font as the other three as well. It is also included here. AARON• ^TALK 22:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... someone could easily have made that cover. Most (if not all) fonts Rihanna used on her artwork are made available to download. As is this image. If there was a cover for the song, it would be on it's digital release, but the album cover was used instead. There's no reliable source to show that the cover is indeed legitimate. "Raining Men", also a radio-only single, has no cover either. Zac 23:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That website is known for using fake covers. Zac 23:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example. Zac 23:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Break It Off wasn't just a radio single. AARON• ^TALK 11:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's cover on iTunes is the Music of the Sun album cover, and it isn't even from that album. Zac 14:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested correction[edit]

Hhhkkkjkjknknknmnnnnbn 2002:47C9:32AF:0:C80A:E6E2:25E6:D46 (talk) 01:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Break It Off. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HkD4d8lG?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fmqb.com%2FArticle.asp%3Fid%3D69239 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=69239

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]