Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Wrong Type of Organisation[edit]

Untitled[edit]

This is still on here as an Executive Agency. The UK Border Force directorate used to be part of the UK Border Agency (which IS an executive agency) but has now been moved to located within the Home Office. The UK Border Agency is still in existence in charge of other areas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.220.74.150 (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong logo[edit]

The new logo is: https://www.online-jobs.co.uk/ukba/graphics/Border_Force_logo.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monabob (talk • contribs) 12:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undermining[edit]

The following sentence is not-neutral ("undermining"), confusing for anyone - like me - who doesn't know the actual events, and futhermore lacks sources: The subsequent undermining of Director General, Brian Moore's handling of airport authorities by the Home Secretary and the enforced focus on Heathrow queue-busting quickly dispelled any remaining confusion about a new law enforcement ethos. 84.23.155.84 (talk) 15:43, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done I agree. It's gone. Pol430 talk to me 20:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight?[edit]

The box says ‘Overviewed [sic] by Independent Police Complaints Commission/Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary’. The text says ‘The work of the Border Force is monitored by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration.’ Which one is correct? – Kaihsu (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both, I believe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.218.162 (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Border Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011174219/http://www.opsi.gov.uk:80/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1979/cukpga_19790002_en_21 to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1979/cukpga_19790002_en_21#pt14-pb1-l1g177

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

paramilitary force?[edit]

Since the cutters seem to armed with guns, is this a paramilitary force? Are the members/officers combatants? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabauz (talk • contribs) 18:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They are not armed...and no, border force officers are not combatants or a paramillitary force.