Talk:Boranes

untitled[edit]

Righty - a minor edit - have just changed deltahedral to polyhedral, which now corresponds with the relevent article. I believe the terms are synonymous

Stui 12:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Family or individual?[edit]

I'm sure borane is the name of a single chemical (BH₃), that then gives rise to a group of similarly constituated chemicals, the boranes. Just like phenol and the phenols.

Borane seems to accept a proton and two electrons to form the borohydride ion, which forms ionic bonds to create sodium borohydride Am I correct, or misled? - Jack (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, borane is BH₃, but also B(CH₃)₃ is a borane. So that part is correct.

Boranes have an empty p-orbital, which can accept any Lewis base (i.e., it can accept anything that has an electron pair .. and borane will accept that). Technically, BH₃ is not the compound, it exists as a dimer (B₂H₆), where each BH₃ moiety accepts electron density from a B-H σ-bond from the other unit. Similar, it will accept H^{-^{(i.e. a proton with two electrons .. it does not accept protons, well, it is reacting with it, not forming 'complexes'!), Similarly, CN^- can donate an electron-pair to it. This is the cyanoborohydride ion, [BH₃CN]^-. These things indeed form ionic salts e.g. NaBH₄ and NaBH₃CN. Etc. etc. So you are quite close to being right. Hope this clarified a bit. Do you feel this info is missing in the article? If so, I could have a look at it. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 14:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So the chemical that should be borane is actually diborane? Damn, I was hoping for a system analogous of the alkanes... I was researching alternative biochemistrys, and came across boron as a charbon subsitute. Should this article be merged with organoborane? - Jack (talk) 15:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, for BH₃ .. would be a better name .. and no, no merge between borane and the organoborane .. two different subjects. One could opt for a move of this page to diborane, and making borane a redirect to that page. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, ignore my last message .. diborane already exists, is about B₂H₆. This is page is about 'boranes' .. though a bit misleading in intro, I think. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Tagged as confusing. Thankyou for your help :) - Jack (talk) 20:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]}}

Borane chemistry[edit]

Having just rewritten the Wades rule article I was surprised how sparse the coverage of boranes is. Thinking about it I agree with the above idea of this becoming a family page. There are too many boranes to warrant a compound article each, but there should be some coverage of them as a class with specific articles for the key compounds (which are there already). I would be happy to make a stab at enhancing it to become an over view of the main topics in borane chemistry including naming IUPAC, deltahedral structures, link to Wades rules, general chemistry, reactivity trends, isomerisation etc. Individual key compound articles could then have a 'see also' link back to it. Let me know! Axiosaurus 21:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

boranes want to know the structure of B3H8[edit]

boranes want to know the structure of B3H8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.252.229.51 (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure B₃H₈ exists as such. B₃H₇ certainly does, but adding another hydride you'd get an octahydrotriborate anion (which is a well-known species). Google for "B3H8" or "NaB3H8" (a simple salt of it) and you'll get lots of papers with various information and images of the structure. DMacks (talk) 15:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zip Fuels[edit]

Borane zip fuels were abandoned by the Air Force not because of the ICBM-redundency issue, but because combustion of borane zip fuels caused corrosive boron deposits in the engine turbines and created a thick black smoke that drew attention to the presence of the aircraft. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cransona (talk • contribs) 21:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boranes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101105082226/http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001465813/DOC_0001465813.pdf to http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001465813/DOC_0001465813.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]