Talk:Booth Theatre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBooth Theatre has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starBooth Theatre is part of the Active Broadway theaters series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2022Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2023Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 10, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that New York City's Broadhurst, Plymouth, Shubert, and Booth Theatres were all designed with curved corners facing Broadway?
Current status: Good article

Location of old Booth's Theatre[edit]

It was at 23rd Street and 6th Avenue, the SE corner -- not the site of the present Booth Theatre. Vzeebjtf (talk) 07:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC) Description on image page is confusing about this. Vzeebjtf (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Vzeebjtf (talk) 07:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 23:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Epicgenius, do you have another QPQ in progress? I'd like to review all four of these articles when the QPQs are ready. Cheers. Flibirigit (talk) 23:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I do actually have five QPQs in progress (three for this nom and two for upcoming noms). These should be done within the next day. Thanks for the heads up. Epicgenius (talk) 01:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Great, will complete the reviews by the end of the weekend. Flibirigit (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Review of Shubert Theatre (Broadway)
  • . Article's prose was expanded more than fivefold on January 30 and nominated within seven days. Length is adequate. Sourcing is great except for one concern: In the "Construction" section, the quote "new New Theatre" needs a citation directly after the sentence. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism concerns were found. All images used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons. QPQ requirement is complete. I will analyze the hooks once I have reviewed all four of the articles for DYK policy. I suggest adding Template:Currency to the "Box office record" section. Flibirigit (talk) 13:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Review of Booth Theatre
  • . Article's prose was expanded more than fivefold on January 31 and nominated within seven days. Length is adequate. Sourcing is great except for a couple minors concerns: In the "45th Street" section, the words "The Booth Theatre" in quotation marks should probably have a citation directly after the sentence. In the "Construction" section, the quote "new New Theatre" needs a citation directly after the sentence. Article is neutral in tone and no plagiarism concerns were found. All images used in the article are freely licensed on the Commons, although the image File:The Booth Theater.jpg is tagged for insufficient copyright information. QPQ requirement is complete. I will analyze the hooks once I have reviewed all four of the articles for DYK policy. I suggest adding Template:Currency to the "Box office record" section. Flibirigit (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Review of hooks
  • I will take a break and do the hooks after lunch today. Flibirigit (talk) 13:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question: . All five of the hooks are interestng, and properly mentioned in each article. ALT2 needs a citation directly at the end of the source sentence as mentioned above. I will assume good faith for the sources which I do not have access to. Minor concerns are noted above on this nomination. Overall approval of this nomination and Template:Did you know nominations/Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre, is pending the above. Thanks for the job well done on these articles. Flibirigit (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Flibirigit: Thanks for the reviews of both nominations and the hooks for the all four articles. I've addressed all the above issues. Epicgenius (talk) 23:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Articles now adhere to all DYK criteria. All five hooks are approved as per my review above. Flibirigit (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ALT4 to T:DYK/P3