Talk:Bollard (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Issues with additions[edit]

I reverted the WP:Huggle-facilitated reversion of my changes to this disambig page by User:Hamtechperson and await any justification of that action here. 67.101.5.148 (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your justification is such, that upon review of said edits, they created information that was either redundant or not needed. Hamtechperson 23:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I added new Bollard items and split the disambig page so that those with the surname of Bollard are separated from other uses. What is your specific issue with doing that? 67.101.5.148 (talk) 23:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with it is that you have two disambiguation tags on the page. If you continue this, we may have a edit war. It is not acceptable to do this. Please help the both of us by, if you want it split, use a section, not a disambiguation tag. Hamtechperson 23:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So I removed {{hndis}}, leaving only {{disambig}}...is that better? 67.101.5.148 (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your addition of a section break; IMHO it's unnecessary (the second bolding of Bollard is enough from my perceptive) but since it sounds like an important issue for you, I can live with it. 67.101.5.148 (talk) 23:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the capitalization fix. I felt it was the only way we could reach a compromise. If you don't want it, remove it (or better yet, add another = to each side). This makes the title slightly larger and bold. Hamtechperson 23:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The new section draws the eye more than just bold text I've found. That's why I inserted it. Hamtechperson 23:52, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]