Talk:Boeing Phantom Works/Archives/2016
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Boeing Phantom Works. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150329092621/http://www.boeing.com:80/boeing/companyoffices/aboutus/brief/bds.page? to http://www.boeing.com/boeing/companyoffices/aboutus/brief/bds.page#pw
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Six weeks since article trimmed by 92%....
It's over six weeks now since BilCat promised 'I will check the history to re-add some information' after trimming with a hatchet. I'd like to add some information to the Echo Voyager section, but it, and everything else, is still gone. Will the page get restored or should I assume we should start from scratch..? Where is BilCat? The world wonders. Doyna Yar (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't get to check the history as I intended, and I've since had a death in the family, so it won't be for the next few weeks either. The article was FAR too long as it was, and about relatively insignificant projects, and in too much detail, that were beyond the scope of an encyclopedia. Such information and detail belong on the company's own website, and Boeing should be able to afford that if it so desires. If an individual project has sufficient coverage in reliable published sources, you might consider creating a separate article for it. - BilCat (talk) 23:08, 9 June 2016 (UTC)