This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Body politic, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Warden (talk) 22:37, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment the first sentence of the lede is gibberish. Maybe someone knows how to check the history and find the last grammatical version? Wegesrand (talk) 12:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to add that the first sentence of that article is Still gibberish and I'm glad this person noted it. This is my first edit and I don't know if I'm doing it right. --Persefony (talk) 00:44, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wegesrand and Persefony: I've rewritten the bulk of the article, the lede should now (finally) be intelligible. —Nizolan(talk · c.) 19:04, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Grand; I hereby withdraw my alarm. Wegesrand (talk) 11:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Section after "Norman conquest" makes no sense to me[edit]
The sentences after 'However, the Norman conquest proved one thing', don't seem to talk about the body politic -- or at least if they do, I don't find the structure of the sentences conducive to understanding how all this relates to the body politic.
