Talk:Boathouse Row

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article[edit]

I wrote essentially "Boathouse Row is a row of boathouses", which seems pretty lame. Should we add "of course" or "as the name implies"? BillFlis 12:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a nice history of the place here with great ref.

Image[edit]

  • I put a request on the Wikipedia image request page for a better photo. THis overhead does it no justice. People from Philly know what the photo I am talking about. Something from eye level that shows the houses and the river. The normal, iconic shot that you always see. Maybe taken at night?--Looper5920 07:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The West River Drive photo. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 07:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The overhead image is a blatant copyvio from Google Maps. If someone can find me the exact lat/long for this location then I can hopefully produce a genuinely public-domain aerial photo from PD USGS sources - but I don't know Philly at all, so I'm having trouble locating the exact area. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Declassified NRO KH-11 imagery of Boathouse Row
        Unfortunately the USGS haven't released the aerial datastream for Philiadelphia and environs. I've uploaded older (blockier, monochrome) KH-11 imagery (right). It's not terribly pretty, so I've not immediately put it into the article. If someone thinks it's worthwhile, please put it in. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Good catch. I agree the monochrome isn't very pretty (but thanks for taking the trouble to find it). Honestly, I don't know that even a really good overhead image adds that much to the article...I imagine it only ended up being used for lack of anything better (the ground photo that's in use now is a new addition). -- JVinocur 02:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • I just took two pictures tonight of boat house row from West River Drive, I am going to upload them both onto Wikipedia either now or tomorrow, depending on whether I can figure out exactly what to do. MBob 05:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
            • Correction, only one of the pictures looked good, the second was blurrier than I had originally thought so I am not going to upload it, but I hope that satisfies what you were looking for. MBob 05:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
              • Err, it's a nice picture, but I'm a little confused about the copyright status. If you took the picture yourself, you'll need to release it under a more free license than that. If not, we'll probably have to take it down; I don't think you can make a fair use case for this.  — JVinocur (talk • contribs) 13:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
                • Actually the photo that I took and put up was taken down about 2 hours later by another person who added the current picture, which is the picture that I am assuming you are talking about when you say that there could be a fair use issue. Which I would agree with, I am not so sure that the picture is being used correctly. MBob 21:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
                  • I have commented out the image with questionable license and restored the image by MBob. I doubt we can claim fair use with Image:12.BoathouseRow2-R.KennedyG.jpg and I have listed it on Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images to try and resolve the issue. johnSLADE (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
                    • MBob, sorry for questioning you about an image that wasn't yours. I like your image -- not so artistic, perhaps, but realism is more appropriate for an encyclopedia anyway. I went ahead and cropped it (plus some other mild tweaking); I hope you like the new look.  — JVinocur (talk • contribs) 00:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
                  • The uploader of the other image has chosen to discuss these issues on User talk:JVinocur#Boathouse Row instead of here. I hope some people will come join the discussion (and watch the edits made to the page itself as well as the two images in question) so a community consensus can be reached.  — JVinocur (talk • contribs) 12:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Boathouse Row. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Boathouse_Row&oldid=1212790339"