Talk:Bluefield Blue Jays

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bluefield Blue Jays article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Baseball: Blue Jays Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto Blue Jays (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States: West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bluefield Blue Jays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bluefield Blue Jays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130117210635/http://bdtonline.com/local/x797275629/MORNING-UPDATE-Blue-Jays-fly-into-Bluefield-to-replace-the-Orioles to http://bdtonline.com/local/x797275629/MORNING-UPDATE-Blue-Jays-fly-into-Bluefield-to-replace-the-Orioles
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.appalachianleague.com/bluefield.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Blue Jays and Ridge Runners[edit]

Hi, I'd like to propose that Bluefield Blue Jays and Bluefield Ridge Runners be merged into one article. I think that the new team (the Ridge Runners) is actually just a rebranding of the old team, and there's no reason to have a separate article for it. This is supported by all relevant articles about the rebrand I can find (MetroNews, Ballpark Digest). For further evidence, you can see that the Ridge Runners use the same Twitter account that the Blue Jays used, created in June 2011, and in their bio, they claim the records set by the Blue Jays ("14-time Appalachian League Champions"). –IagoQnsi (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Baseballfan1948, NatureBoyMD, TR6824, Jeffconn, and Fatpig73: pinging recent editors –IagoQnsi (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I forgot to mention: If we do this merge, I think we should keep the Blue Jays article (since it has the longer page history) but move it to the title "Bluefield Ridge Runners". –IagoQnsi (talk) 18:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was ready to object to this, but I can't come up with a good reason to do so. Some Appy League teams were owned and operated by MLB clubs. Others, like Bluefield, look to have been owned by Toronto and operated by a local group. I guess it seems reasonable to treat it as a rebranding rather than a separate club. I wish Template:Infobox baseball team had former affiliation and classification fields, so that information could still be displayed in the infobox, or that we'd just continue using Template:Infobox Minor League Baseball with this team. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in complete agreement here...this seems no different to me than not having separate pages for the San Francisco Giants and the New York Giants. The Bluefield team is effectively one organization that has changed its name and affiliation over the years -- besides, the Bluefield Orioles already redirects to the Bluefield Blue Jays. Merge them. CPAScott (talk) 17:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No other Appy League team does this, since the franchises are all considered to be entirely new entities, with the minor league affiliates considered defunct. This also seems to be the practice on Wikipedia, where the new summer collegiate pages are separate from the minor league affiliated ones...I don't see why Bluefield should be any different from the others. Tom Danson (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The press release on the team's rebranding makes clear that the Ridge Runners are the same ownership, front office, everything. There isn't a separate page for the Bluefield Orioles. Why should there be one for the Ridge Runners? Aresef (talk) 01:04, 3 August 2022

Oppose I would consider this a soft oppose. The key distinction being that the Blue Jays were a professional minor league team with major league affiliations in their history, while the Ridge Runners are a newly created amateur summer collegiate team.Skilgis1900 (talk) 13:25, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose this as a stand-along proposal, given the set of similar teams with two pages. So, Bristol Pirates became Bristol State Liners; Burlington Royals became Burlington Sock Puppets; Danville Braves became Danville Otterbots; etc. So, oppose for now, without predjucing a broader discussion on the discussion of this league. Klbrain (talk) 16:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given the uncontested objections with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]