Talk:Bluebell wood

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Europe may be able to help!

A note[edit]

I heard a rumor that any wood carpeted with bluebells has been there for at least a millenium. That sounds like a very interesting fact if its true. Googling the only semi relevent comment I can find is that the Surrey woods have bluebells and have been there for at least a thousand years [1]. If anyone can confirm this it'd be an interesting addition. --RickiRich 21:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-- done Hopsyturvy 12:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable bluebell woods - really notable?[edit]

Hi. I question the worth of the "Notable bluebell woods" section, at least in its present form. The sole example in Haringey is minute, and unlikely to be notable compared with some of the really large and well-known examples. Why is it here, and why is the section here? Nomorenonotnever (talk) 16:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: that section, including the "citation needed" tag has been there for over two years, with no additions. I've deleted it for the moment: if anybody feels like re-adding the info with a few other notable woods, they can always revert Dom Kaos (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Image Available[edit]

Perhaps something hi-resolution would be useful for this article.

File:Bluebell Wood Forest of Dean.jpeg

Bluebell Wood Forest of Dean

Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bluebell wood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090415162235/http://www.treeforall.org.uk:80/AboutTreeForAll/WhyTreeForAll/Nature+notes/bluebells.htm to http://www.treeforall.org.uk/AboutTreeForAll/WhyTreeForAll/Nature+notes/bluebells.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]