Talk:Blood tribute

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: South America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	South American military history task force

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for this translation from here- impressive!.

VickKiang 08:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision[edit]

There was one major issue of wording in the translation — the use of "conscription" for the blood tribute. In his book on the subject ("The Tribute of Blood"), Peter M. Beattie emphasizes that impressment is not conscription. Both are coercitive, and they're often conflated. But impressment/forced recruitment is the method described in this article, whereas conscription is enlisting and calling eligible citizens i.e. what the 1874 and 1908 laws tried to implement. One is ancient and by brute force, the other one in its modern form is a French Revolution/industrial age innovation enforced bureaucratically. Hence, Brazil transitioned from impressment to conscription in 1916. The differences go on and on. Conscripts in the modern sense (post-1916 in Brazil) serve for limited periods and are transferred to the reserve. The old Brazilian system, with soldiers serving for many years and then finishing their military obligations, has more in common with present-day volunteer armies; in fact, after 1874 or 1891 it was an all-volunteer army on paper. Professional/career soldiers are the opposite of conscripts. What can make this difficult to understand is that nowadays there's a dichotomy between conscript and professional/volunteer armies. Prior to 1916, the Brazilian army was superficially like the latter; after 1916, it was truly a conscript army.

One more detail: tropas de linha apparently refers to first-line i.e. Army units, as opposed to the second-line (National Guard). Serraria (talk) 22:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]