Talk:Block suballocation
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Old discussion[edit]
Merging tail-packing & Block suballocation looks like a good idea to me. Go for it. Alan 05:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
It seems to me that the criticism section is both on the wrong page (belongs as part of the reiser article) and also completely false, at least from what I read. For a good deal of time Reiser had the best performance of anything out there, and much of that was due to the tail packing.
Since I'm not that sure; I just flagged it cn, if someone else wants to do more it would be a good idea —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.176.113 (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- The criticisms section is pretty awful as-is. The statement is specific to ReiserFS, it's unclear as to whether it applies to just that file system or any with tail packing, it's completely unsourced, and it's been marked with multiple 'cn' and related markers for ages. I'm deleting it. EvanED (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Block suballocation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061113155043/http://www.namesys.com/disk_usage.html to http://www.namesys.com/disk_usage.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061113154730/http://www.namesys.com/X0reiserfs.html to http://www.namesys.com/X0reiserfs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)