Talk:Blenheim order of battle

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / Dutch / European / French / German / Nordic / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	Nordic military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Images of commanders[edit]

I like the photos of commanders on the list (which I put in). It makes a rather dry presentation more interesting. I would think it would merit a brief note in the discussion section before the wholesale deletion of them.--CSvBibra (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if others would write pro or con on whether having the photos of the commanders adds to the article.--CSvBibra (talk) 17:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]