Talk:Blazin' Squad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split[edit]

"Later, according to a somewhat authoritative source, the band has finally split altogether, although no dates have been specified."

Erm, could we at least know what this "somewhat authoritative" source is, and, moreover, could we find at least a mostly authoritative source for this encyclopedia article? Cheers ;-) — Matt Crypto 23:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Punk?[edit]

Pop- PUNK???!!! Punk? I hardly think so, what was so punk about Blazin' Squad? Not a guitar or punk attitude in sight!

Punk wasn't about playing instruments, it was about a "give a shit" attitude to life and doing what annoys high society and Blazin Squad do just that. So they are 21st century punks, not like the has-been Sex Pistols. AlfredG 15.06.06

Blazin' Squad weren't punks. They were chav puppets of the record company; something to make money from and then disgard. High society love moneyspinners like them and the Sex Pistols. It keeps the rich in Bolly and caviar. RossyG 23:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

This group is just a joke. I mean, the information on it's members is just spice-girl-esque PR used to promote the band.. Mr Spum 15:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It reads like it was written by someone with an I.Q. lower than that of a hamster. I'd rewrite it myself but I fear I couldn't get past Blazin' Squad make me want to kill myself.

Disputed and citation tags[edit]

I've added these tags as there are no references in this article. This means that none of the information presented can be taken as fact. Please add them to make the article believeable. --alexdeangelis86 13:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Praise[edit]

i think they're good, concidering they were only 16 they wrote and produced good music for their age —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.207.136.57 (talk) 14:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bsnon.jpg[edit]

Image:Bsnon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stop putting were[edit]

blazin squad are in the studio recording a new album, so whoever keeps turning it back to pasttense as if they dont exist anymore please stop it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.12.133.206 (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Blazin' Squad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Somerville[edit]

Marcel Somerville is one of the participants in Love Island (2017 TV series) so presumably a link between the two might help readers 15:18, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Page needs updating[edit]

As the ban are still going have been since 2017 with 5 members now Theboss723456 (talk) 21:01, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]