Talk:Black studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Question: What part of this article could/should be spun out?[edit]

What part of this article could/should be spun out? Daniel Power of God (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Power of God: I'm pulling this RfC for several reasons, including: (i) there is no indication that WP:RFCBEFORE has been observed, let alone exhausted; (ii) this is a WP:SPLIT matter, therefore not appropriate for RfC. That is not to say that discussion may not continue: by all means discuss a split proposal, just not as an RfC. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a third opinion first? Then if it becomes too confusing we can post to the relevant projects or noticeboards (if any). jps (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, jps, I will try third opinion next. Daniel Power of God (talk) 11:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About the Third Opinion request: The request made at Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made here. Note also that Third Opinion is not a help desk, but a dispute resolution venue. It's not apparent that there is even a dispute here. — TransporterMan (TALK) 22:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) (Not watching this page)[reply]

Why not just WP:BEBOLD, Daniel, and spin out? Someone can always revert if they disagree. jps (talk) 01:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

jps, done. Daniel Power of God (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]