Talk:Black cocaine

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Citations[edit]

the eugenio berrios section has no clues to be proven to be true —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.44.232.235 (talk • contribs) 19:39, May 21, 2008 (UTC)

Exactly. I cite the reference: "With mounting evidence that Pinochet personally planned the 1992 execution of Huber, former allies such as Contreras have turned on Pinochet and are now alleging a stunning list of crimes and cover-ups." Just because he might have engaged in drug trade, doesn't mean he did, whereas the allegations have been presented as facts in this article. Uncorrect. False or otherwise unproven claims by people who have turned against each other cannot be presented as facts. I'm removing this. I don't think it should be added again, unless properly written, but this hasn't been proven, and you could fill a million articles with controversial things/offenses Pinochet might've done. I don't think it belongs in the article. Not to mention it is very trivial to what this article is about, too, namely black cocaine. And I'm not defending Pinochet here, I'd like to add, in case this might seem politically motivated.--217.136.149.93 (talk) 14:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it anyway, there are better sources.--Auric (talk) 16:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New source on Pinochet cocaine is only allegations, too. If true, you'd never hear the end of it. Leftists are obsessed with Pinochet. --105.0.0.192 (talk) 19:11, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Black cocaine. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.typicallyspanish.com/news/publish/article_15169.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Activated charcoal[edit]

Sorry I'm new to participating in talk threads so this may not format properly or be in line with best practices. Anyways, I edited the tidbit on activated charcoal making cocaine undetectable to drug sniffing dogs to just an assertion of a possibility that activated charcoal could do such a thing. It probably shouldn't be there since it isn't sourced and it sounds incredibly unlikely, but I'd rather not completely delete relevant information. Perhaps even if it isn't true now, it may have been at one time, or in one place, or thought to be true, so it might as well stay, just qualified as a possibility rather than a fact. Vwermisso (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]