Talk:Binary cam

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Binay Cam lives again![edit]

After being deleted by some moderators for appearing to be "blatant advertising" (I don't necessarily blame them for this!) I convinced them to bring it back and have worked to tighten it up so that this mistake wont happen again. I guess it was my fault, I kinda rushed to get it up and got sidetracked before I ever got around to making it nicer. That said I have learned a lot in the process of fixing up this article so hopefully I can carry this experience over to future articles.

I tried to get as many sources as I could, it was not easy, archery is not exactly a very broad hobby. In some cases forum posts were the best I could do. I'll keep an eye out if anything else pops up though.

Anyway if anyone wishes to contribute anything please feel free, I am fairly new to archery myself and would not take it personally if some of the things I said were to be corrected. Anyway, hope you like it!

Hayaku 09:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that bows with binary cams never need cam-timing tuning. I think this is an overstatement, though an understandable one. Binary cams certainly need less cam-timing tuning than conventional twin-cams, but they can still go out of time as the cables and string creep. The manufacturers are claiming a bit too much. Mr Barndoor 13:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aaah ok, yeah this is kinda true. It was my understanding that even despite the factors you mentioned the cams still maintained such a relative degree synchronisation that the tune loss was negligible at best. But if you think it needs changing I will change it, your call. Hayaku 14:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, probably best to leave it until we start hearing some long-term experience reports from binary-cam shooters. They're certainly a big improvement on twin cams for synchronisation. Mr Barndoor 15:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]