Talk:Big Well (Kansas)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Largest well[edit]

I have not seen this well billed as the "world's deepest hand-dug well," and clearly the Brighton well is much deeper. But simple arithmetic shows that the Big Well is much larger in terms of volume. The Brighton well, generously allowing for about 400 feet at 6 ft diameter and 900 at 4 ft diameter, has a volume of about 22,600 cu. ft. At 32 feet in diameter and 109 ft deep, the Big Well displaces 87,700 feet. So while the Brighton well is about ten times deeper, the Big Well is nearly four times bigger. NTK 13:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure who later added the reference to the Pozzo, but thanks. That is clearly a Big Well that dwarves the midwestern one and is a rather amazing bit of history too. There should be an article on it. NTK 19:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado[edit]

I don't think that Earth is capable of producing a wind powerful enough to lift a half ton meteroite. Don't you think? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.245.145.76 (talk) 07:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Probably not, but it's quite possibly been buried. And who knows; perhaps the well has caved in with all the destruction around it, in which case the rock would be buried deeply indeed. Nyttend 12:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, tornadoes have been known to lift cars and big rigs off of the ground and transport them great distances. Hell, some have stripped the asphalt off of the roads. I'm sure this meteorite was affected somehow by the tornado. 74.70.57.184 (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big Well[edit]

Is there any reason for the (Kansas) in the title? This could be moved to Big Well which redirects here. — Robert Greer (talk) 02:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Big Well (Kansas). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Well (Kansas). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]