Talk:Bickerton Hill

Cheshire Mid‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

British and Irish hills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

A fact from Bickerton Hill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Raw Head (pictured), in Cheshire, England, was a Marilyn, but was demoted in 2009 after a re-survey?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

Assessment Report[edit]

The article needs to be expanded.
It should make use of sections.
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)

Peter I. Vardy 14:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed wind-monitoring mast[edit]

Official planning decisions url (no information as of 11 Feb 2008): [1] Espresso Addict (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broken links in references[edit]

Several of the English Nature/Cheshire Biodiversity links in the reference list are no longer available; the new English Nature site [2] is currently unnegotiable as most of the sublinks are broken. Espresso Addict (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Access with dogs[edit]

"Since March 2008 the National Trust has refused access to the area to walkers with unleashed dogs."

I was there this afternoon, and I don't think this is the case. The NT has put up notices on access points (they were actually there in February) about removing dog faeces, but I don't believe the access of unleashed dogs is currently prohibited. Certainly it could be unenforceable, as there is no permanent NT presence there. I will take a closer look at the signs when I next visit. Espresso Addict (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seemed unlikely to me for the reasons you've given (inability to enforce it,etc, and parallels with other similar NT sites I've visited myself, though I don't have a dog and so wasn't especially looking out for such signs), which I why I removed the rather partisan political statement when it was first entered, and then placed a fact tag on the more neutral one which was subsequently added. DDStretch (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Since March 2008 the National Trust has required all dogs entering this and their other sites to be on a lead."

If this is a general prohibition relating to all Trust land, then I'm not sure how necessary it is to mention it in this article. I can't get the NT site to load at the moment, will try again later. Espresso Addict (talk) 12:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neither am I, but at least it was added (and I put it into a bit more standard ref format). DDStretch (talk) 12:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I visited this afternoon, and there are new notices at access points requesting that dogs are kept on a lead during the nesting season. I've removed the note in the article, as this is an extremely common access statement not only for NT land but also other landowners, and the emphasis seemed disproportionate here. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bickerton Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716210628/http://www.cheshire-biodiversity.org.uk/action-plans/listing.php?id=31 to http://www.cheshire-biodiversity.org.uk/action-plans/listing.php?id=31

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Bickerton Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bickerton Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]