Talk:Beyond Outrage

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

Japan: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:48, May 16, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Spallek, Bettina; Subaru (11 June 2016). "Outrage Beyond: Collectors Edition". AnimePro.de. Archived from the original on 31 October 2016.

Kinema Junpo[edit]

Elvenscout742 said "I didn't mention WP:TITLE. I just said we should be precise" with this edit today. However, he said "This way is more WP:PRECISE" with this edit just 3 days ago. WP:TITLE includes WP:PRECISE. So it's really disruptive for us. 124.102.61.115 (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rule against linking to a Wikipedia guideline that says we should be precise, when I am saying we should be precise. Just because the main theme of the page I linked to is about article titles, doesn't mean my point was not valid. Please explain why you care so deeply about not mentioning which Best Ten it was and what year it was that you have reverted me eight times. You are obviously one and the same as JoshuSasori, since in my eight years of editing Wikipedia he is the only user I have ever come across who was this obsessed with blocking me out of editing certain articles. elvenscout742 (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's your obsession with JoshuSasori? I'm not JoshuSasori. You can't accuse me of being his sockpuppet without any clear evidence. And as I said before, JoshuSasori opposed my move request at Talk:Densha Otoko (film) and reverted/undid my edits at Nagisa Oshima, Manami Konishi and Koji Yakusho. Additionally, I removed the image from Takayuki Yamada, which JoshuSasori had repeatedly restored.

Please explain why you have persistently deleted the IndieWire review and image caption which I added. Unexplained content delete is discouraged in Wikipedia. 123.224.143.28 (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took a second look at the Kinema Junpo page, and it's still written as "キネマ旬報ベスト・テン" in title bar. I don't think we should change the title of the source when using Template:Cite web. 123.224.143.28 (talk) 08:30, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your activities here and elsewhere indicate that either you are JoshuSasori, in which case you are evading a block, or you are engaging in the exact same type of activity that got JoshuSasori blocked (obsessively following me to numerous articles and deliberately undermining me/altering all my edits beyond recognition).

I re-checked the relevant guideline and nowhere does it say we have to use the title bar if we are citing online sources. I decided when I wrote the sentence and cited my source that I would give a translation of the more specific title given on the actual page.[1] You then (in a somewhat offensive manner highly reminiscent of JoshuSasori) referred to my chosen citation style as an "error" and altered it.[2] Why do you persist in trying to pretend I have never edited this article? And why is your behaviour so very reminiscent of my Wikistalker JoshuSasori?

elvenscout742 (talk) 00:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

なつかしい。 Boneyard90 (talk) 16:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]