Talk:Bernal sphere

Doesn't David Gerrold use one, with engines added, in Galactic Whirlpool? Trekphiler 23:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Space stations and habitats in popular culture#Bernal spheres|Bernal sphere in popular culture]] The anchor (Bernal spheres) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Gravity?[edit]

Could we have some explanation how gravity would work in one of these, as surely if its a sphere areas further from the equator would not experience as much gravity?

Well, low-gravity environments might be useful for experiments and certain scientific or industrial processes. Also please sign your posts. Jafet 15:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agriculture can work much better with trees or other product growing faster in low gravity environments, same goes for any low gravity industry 99.236.221.124 (talk) 22:29, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add this to the page.[edit]

Just a little reference. It is being used in elite dangerous. http://elite-dangerous.wikia.com/wiki/Starport It's the occulus starport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.188.199 (talk) 12:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernals original proposal[edit]

Can we have more detail on Bernals original proposal - eg confirm it was rotating, what rate ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Island Two[edit]

Was "Island Two" a Sphere, or the Stanford torus ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]