Talk:Beriev

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no move Part Deux 19:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Beriev Aircraft CompanyBeriev — more common usage; brings in line with other ex-Soviet design bureaus —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 23:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:

What's the problem with moving, as long as you keep a redirect from the present title? go ahead, no need to poll... I'm not moving it myself as I don't care which of the two ways it is named. --BACbKA 09:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The above requested move discussion[edit]

I have asked that Beriev (the redirect page) be deleted so that this article can be moved there. As I tried putting in the edit for the move (before being told that page already exists there), if it is good enough for Boeing, Ilyushin, Tupolev, Kamov, Yakovlev, need I go on, then it is good enough for Beriev. --Russavia 11:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]