Talk:Benjamin Baker (engineer)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	August 19, 2010

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

London Transport Mid‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Peterlewis 09:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC) added details of Baker's life and achievements[reply]

I have reverted the article twice now to restore images to their rightful place, that is by the section to which they refer. Please explain why anyone wants to rvert again. "Ugliness" is entirly subjective and POV. Peterlewis (talk) 07:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with this reverting again and again. As said, the introduction is the wrong place for these pictures. The pictures of the bridges belong in the section "bridges", because there they are described. That is a much better place, not the introduction. Also, you placed Cleopatras Needle picture two times, that's overdone. And furthermore, the pictures partially overlaps the table of contents, because you totally cluttered the introduction with the pictures, that's ugly! Please give your rationale why to place the picture in the top, instead of the section where they are described. Demophon (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your arrangement is very poor because the pictures all fall to the bottom and are not related to the sections of the article. Very "ugly". If you want to make a reasonable edit, then I suggest you write more text and show some responsibility. Peterlewis (talk) 21:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, the earlier situation was fine as it was, I don't have to justify that. Instead, you are changing the arrangement, so you have to come with a better reason why (you didn't do that in the edit summary). Don't turn it around!

But 'again':

Argumentation 1: The is not a lot of space in the top to put a lot of pictures there, since the introduction is short and there is already a Infobox with a picture (on the right) and a content box (on the left) there. There isn't simply not enough space to put three extra pictures there. It makes it even worse because then they are partially overlapping the content box, that's ugly and impractically. But I do not see why it should be changed, since again the pictures have to be put in the right section:

Argumentation 2: Pictures of subjects have to be placed in the topic in which the subjects are described. There is a seperate section about the Tay bridge disaster and one about the Forth bridge. So the pictures should be logically be placed there. Demophon (talk) 03:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York[edit]

This-- "referring to his design of the elevated railroad in New York in 1868, some of which still survives in Manhattan (unused)" --is terribly wrong although possibly it is what some source says. The first elevated railroad was definitely designed by Charles T. Harvey, verified by the multiple patents Harvey filed for all the details of the structure. Additionally the last of Harvey's pioneering structure was removed in 1879, replaced by new iron, because it was already too weak for newer trains. JoeBrennan (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]