Talk:Be Our Guest/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 15:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 15:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances

I'm just watching the segment on YouTube, and I'm not sure what credited by Hollywood.com as a "Song Performer" adds to the understanding of the performance. The Oscars flashes hundreds of names on the screen within less than a minute, and that's when they're lucky. It's great that Hollywood.com managed to transcribe was they listed him under, but it add nothing. Keep the reference itself, but loose the unnecessary detail.

Done. Removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Covers and parodies

I've reworded The Simpsons, and restructured the overall section; you had a cover in the same paragraph as a parody. They were both cartoons, but another cartoon parody was off by itself.

Ant and Dec need a reference or multiple. Here's a few reliable sources:
In a word or two, who are Ant and Dec? Most people out of Britain will think "if they've got one word names, maybe they're cartoon characters?"

Done and done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reviews

I've squelched the two uses of Oh-My-Disney. It's a BuzzFeed knock off, and serves little to no factual content. Disney Parks Blog, wonderful resource, D23, amazing, OMD? Not for Wikipedia.

I'll return to this section later.

Music and lyrics

Where does MusicNotes say that this is mid-tempo, specifically? On this page, they say that it's "Tempo: Freely, Metronome: q = 50", but I see you're referencing that later in the section.

Removed. You're right.--Changedforbetter (talk) 15:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More later. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing infobox, lead, critical reviews.

Background

Studio chief of Walt Disney Pictures or the animation studios?

Changed to chief executive officer.--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"the entire scene re-animated": I'm not seeing this represented in the source. Wouldn't they just reanimate the portion of the image where Belle is to be?

Done. Removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Context, scene and analysis

I think you could get away with simply "A "food chorus line"," and moving that Moviefone reference to the end of the sentence.

Done.--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it's commonly referred to as a showstopper, then you should be able to reference something other than Disney.com

I cited Disney.com here because I had completed the critical reviews section first, which featured most of the "show stopper" references. Done. Cited IndieWire as well.--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Preceding the inception and establishment of the studio's successful computer-animated division and subsidiary Pixar Animation Studios," This makes it sound like Pixar was established after 1991, which it was not, and that their initial features were produced as a Disney corporation, as opposed to two companies with a distribution deal.

"Preceding the inception and establishment of the studio's successful computer-animated division and subsidiary Pixar Animation Studios" simply removed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pixar system: most people don't realize that Pixar has its own proprietary software, that it would sell back then.

I'm not quite sure what you want me to do here. It is cited in the reference. Should I remove it?--Changedforbetter (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would this sentence be referring to Pixar Image Computer or RenderMan Interface Specification? "[Pixar] system" should link to one of them.

Oh, I see. Well in that case Pixar Image Computer.--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- Zanimum (talk) 00:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's everything. GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 13:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]