Talk:Battle of White Bird Canyon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B-Class Comments[edit]

The first section of this article (Prelude) is only sourced at one point (where it references the size of the reservation). This pattern is repeated in subsequent sections, making the origin of some information unclear. The "Truce Party" section is the best-sourced, and it would be good to see the article reach that standard. My preference is one cite per paragraph, especially when names and dates are used.

Another issue is the sourcing itself. Two of the three web sources (the WildWest article and McDermott's work) are no longer available. Since McDermott's is heavily-used, I considered this important.

Somehow (probably in the cut/past operation to add the B-Class Template) the supporting materials were marked as 'n.' This is incorrect, and I'm fixing that. The article does in fact have great supporting materials. Intothatdarkness 21:57, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not even close to B-class, sources OK as far as they go, but not nearly enough footnotes. Basically, B-class means no unsourced sections, decent prose, but just not quite ready for GA review. Montanabw(talk) 00:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Battle of White Bird Canyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]