Talk:Battle of Pork Chop Hill

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Pork Chop Hill article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / Korean / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thailand C‑class Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Untitled[edit]

I am going to start annotating this article as soon as I finish expanding the article. The amount of material on the Chinese view appears limited but I will include what I have. For now it appears it can remain a single article covering both actions.--Buckboard 12:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

the casualty maybe wrong[edit]

I think the casualties of both sides were wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.144.96.158 (talk) 04:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties are wrong![edit]

"Company K (1st Lt. Joseph G. Clemons, Jr.) and Company L (1st Lt. Forrest J. Crittendon), 31st Infantry, in reserve behind the MLR, were ordered to counterattack and began their attack at 04:30 on April 17. By dawn they reached the main trenches on top of the hill but suffered almost 50% casualties" - this would mean that total casualties of UN were from these companies.... This has to be wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.127.116 (talk) 17:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong is equating the 50% casualties of King and Love companies to the total casualties (476) of that April battle. King had 135 men to start with. Love probably wasn't very different and I think Love's supporting attack (of King's attack) was 2 platoons amounting to 62 men. Don't forget that Easy of the 31st was originally there and overrun suffering heavily. Able, Easy, Fox, and George of the 17th also fought on Pork Chop and most of them had a pretty rough time as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.253.187.17 (talk) 09:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COL. R.F. Arment,USA, (Ret) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.217.10 (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Pork Chop Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move discussion notification[edit]

A requested move discussion is occurring at Talk:Pork Chop Hill#Requested move 3 October 2022 to consider moving Pork Chop Hill to Pork Chop Hill (film). Users interested in this page may want to participate in the discussion, which is related to this page. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]