Talk:Battle of Lođa

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Serbia

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Balkan / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force

KLA Victory?[edit]

How is it an exact KLA Victory? Put on some Refs... Bлaдoв Vladov (talk) 03:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Dispute[edit]

Your reference of victory is not a KLA Victory, its Yugoslav Victory because they took control of area. FRYugoslavHero (talk) 01:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article[edit]

Delete it, too many lies and unnecessary editing. FRYugoslavHero (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and verifiability[edit]

It's frustrating to see an editor substituting "Yugoslavia" for "Serbia" everywhere; the source actually talks about Serb forces. Neutrality and verifiability are not optional. Can't we just stick to what sources say, instead of pov-pushing? bobrayner (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It should be Yugoslavia. Nebojsa Pavkovic is army general and there was only 1 army - Yugoslav army. --Alexmilt (talk) 19:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, same source mention Serbia's Kosovo province. Lets add that Kosovo is Serbis province should we, Bob? Can't we just stick to what sources say? Not to mention Two Yugoslav soldiers. We should add also 2 Yugoslav soldiers into combatant, as sources mention that also. --WhiteWriter^speaks 21:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]