Talk:Battle of Empel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Empel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"back over the Rhine to Empel"[edit]

"Philip of Hohenlohe-Neuenstein breached the dikes of Bommelwaard, forcing the Spanish back over the Rhine to Empel."

This statement is erroneous, since Empel lies not on the banks of the Rhine but on the south (left) side of the river Maas (the Dutch name for the Meuse as it flows through the Netherlands).

The Waal channel of the river Rhine flows parallel to the Maas at this point, a few miles to the north, bordering the northern shore of the 'island' of the Bommelerwaard.

Changing accordingly.

JF42 (talk) 10:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties and losses[edit]

@Archiepo Could you quote me what the new source says about the losses exactly? None of the Dutch sources I have read talk about many casualties, but just about an escape. Just like the Dutch source used in the article DavidDijkgraaf (talk) 12:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the author is not an historian DavidDijkgraaf (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi David, it says on all of the articles that the Spanish were able to attack and burn the ships. On a side note, I also read from both the Spanish and Dutch articles that ships were captured and burnt, there just isn't an exact number regarding the statistic. I suppose I could reword it to "Several ships burnt or captured," as we don't know the exact number but we do know that ships were burnt and/or captured. Hope that clears things up, cheers! Archiepo (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]