Talk:Battery holder

May 2008[edit]

restored links to Duracell, eveready, batteryholders.org deleted commercial links to www.abatteryholders.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turbotom1 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Keyu Electronics, OK, first of all I spend several days writting the article. Second: You deleted the links to the history of battery companies which is directly tied to batteries and holders. Third: you deleted the history of battery holder patents and several links to reasearch pages about how to make a good design.

If you want to contibute something at least show some class and make a contribution less commercial. Dont link to product pages but to informative pages. What, When, How and why ? This is an encylopedia, why not write about testing your company has done, research results, test methods, design considerations or concerns. We could punch up the content in contact information as described below by me. Tom.

From Keyu, Wikipedia is a open wiki. If I won't change it. Someone also can change it.org is for company.Tricker.Give me a reasonable explain.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Turbotom1 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

A Work in progress and may take several weeks to complete.

It will add to the article if additional details about the relationship of contact forces, contact wiping action and/or details about good contact design.

Elements could include concepts like Metallic Electromigration, creep corrosion, tinn commandments, contact fretting and high conductivity using commercial contacts finishes.

Design of plastic housings: tips, formulas, areas of concern, problematic areas, etc.

T. Blaha (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Added links to battery holder articles published in electronic component magazines. The detailing in the articles provided the reader with greater depth of knowledge then the small amount of information published herein. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turbotom1 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battery holder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:32, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

These aren't photos of real-world battery holders. These are photos from MPD promotional materials. (The white silkscreened "MPD" markings would cost too much for commodity battery holders like this.) This article would look less like an advertisement if the images were edited to remove the obvious brand advertising play. It might also avoid irritating competitors. (Disclaimer: I have purchased MPD products before, which is how I recognized the name and the disconnect from their actual products, as-sold.) --Tim McNerney (talk) 22:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]