Talk:Batman & Mr. Freeze: SubZero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Best reviewed Batman movie[edit]

I think the reception section is extremely deceptive. Yes, the movie has 90% positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, but that represents a total of 9 positive votes (none of which came from RT Top Critics). In reality, the film actually received a rather poor reception compared to its predecessor Mask of the Phantasm. The only reason this film received a higher percentage of positive reviews is because it only had a total of 10 as opposed to Phantasm which had two dozen, several of which were from Top Critics.

It's so dubious because the theatrical Phantasm's reception received shining reviews from such prestigious sources as the Washington Post and Siskel & Ebert, where this film had such poor reception that the WB delayed its release by a year, and then just put it out on video. And no prestigious reviewer saw fit to even review this film. HpK1029 (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Tears of Joy[edit]

I know this is a rather pointless thing to mention, but if the writer of this article's plot summary did this on purpose, I'd like to congratulate them: The ending of the summary says that the discovery of Nora's health begins "driving [Fries] to tears of joy." If anyone else here payed attention to the original Animated Series, then you might notice the callback to the first Freeze episode, "Heart of Ice": when Batman points out the tragic nature of Freeze's origin story in that episode, Freeze responds, "It would drive me to tears, if I still had tears to shed." Amazing. If the reference to this quote in this article was unintentional, then it's a brilliant coincidence. --Raddaluigi (talk) 03:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Batman & Mr. Freeze: SubZero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Timm wrong about when Nora Fries was revealed alive?[edit]

I read the interview where Bruce Timm said Nora was brought back in SubZero without him being informed, but wasn't Nora was first revealed to be alive in 1994 in the BTAS episode "Deep Freeze"? That episode aired three years before SubZero was completed-- and Timm himself is credited as having coming up with the story, along with Paul Dini. The article says that Timm viewed her as lifeless within the cryo-chamber, but doesn't Grant Walker agree to restore Nora in the episode? I'm a bit confused, honestly. Could Timm be misremembering? Or was the screenplay for SubZero written before "Deep Freeze," and the episode was conceived by Timm and Dini as a way to link it to the film?Gokitalo (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]