Talk:Baryulgil, New South Wales

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is this actually a town?[edit]

I suspect this may actually be a station (cattle/sheep property) rather than a town. There is no sign of the town at the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the Australian Electoral Commision or the NSW Electoral Commision. It was common for indigenous Australians to grow up on cattle stations in the era around the turn of the century. many Aboriginal families worked on the stations, herding cattle and sheep etc. More evidence of the existence of a town is needed, I think especially as Google Maps doesn't turn up much either. -- Mattinbgn\talk 11:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note:There does appear to be a place called Baryulgil (note the syllable swap) on the Clarence River. See here and here. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure now that this should be at Baryulgil, New South Wales. Will wait for discussion below since I am not the creator of the article. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is described as a parish by the Geographical Names Board, and it probably should be renamed to Yulgilbar Parish, Clarence according to the conventions. But it was created in 1971 (!) and is not listed in Clarence County, New South Wales. Note also the history "Name of the prpoerty of Edward D.S. Ogilvie".--Grahame (talk) 03:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an actual place. It is currently little more than a small settlement but still has a school, for example. Historically, it was a fairly thriving little town when mining occurred in the area until the 1970's. Yendor of yinn (talk) 10:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baryulgil, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]