Talk:Balboa Park station/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WelpThatWorked (talk · contribs) 19:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Refs #48 and #12 are broken. Prose and images all look fine, though is it possible to add more on the station's impact on the area around it? Pi.1415926535 WelpThatWorked (talk) 16:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed #12, and replaced #48. I'll try to find something on that, though I didn't come across a lot in my research. Unlike a lot of BART stations, Balboa Park was in an existing neighborhood and didn't attract a lot of development. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pi.1415926535 alright, I couldn't find anything either, so I think i'll just push it to GA. Nice job WelpThatWorked (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]