This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
The last paragraph is one long run-on sentence. As this is a low priority page, I will edit it to create seperate sentences. It is hard to read otherwise. If no editor objects to it within five days, I will begin on February 1st. 74.69.127.200 (talk) 19:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article cites a U.K. National Audit Office report as substantiation of the statement that Bagshot Park lies in the designated area of Windsor Great Park. This is a confusing statement; the ‘designated area’ referred to appears to be site much larger than the contemporary Great Park, and Bagshot is some miles outside the boundary of the present Great Park. Should this statement be clarified or qualified in some way, to avoid confusion? Djewesbury (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
