Talk:Bagler

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Norse history and culture High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / Nordic

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	Nordic military history task force

Naming[edit]

Bagli Party is not a good name. I suggest Crosier Party, since the word "bagal" is derived from latin Baccallum, which means crosier. The party was so named because it was supported by the church (for some odd reason not mentioned in the text), so using the term 'Crosier Party' would actually add meaning to it.

--Sparviere (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pretenders vs kings.[edit]

Why style them as "pretenders"? They were all technically kings. As they were all given that title at the thing, which was the traditional, and official, way that such a title was bestowed upon someone. --Tokle (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Birkebeiner and Bagler articles into Civil war era in Norway article[edit]

Suggestion for some editor(s) who know(s) far more about these topics than I do: All three articles need work and overlap each other extensively. While cleaning them up, merge into it the two articles Birkebeiner and Bagler, cleaning up the lacks of citations and resolving any contradictions between the three articles. (E.g., were or were not the Baglers peasants?) Then, delete the Birkebeiner and Bagler articles. Acwilson9 (talk) Acwilson9 (talk) 04:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]