Talk:Badger Mountain (Douglas County, Washington)

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus to move. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Badger Mountain → Badger Mountain, Douglas County, Washington—move this page to Badger Mountain, Douglas County, Washington and turn Badger Mountain into a disambiguation page (like Rattlesnake Mountain). There are 16 summits similarly named in the US including two in Washington State. --Oh Snap (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Oppose In order to justify adding that much precision to a title (being concise in titles is highly valued in WP), you need to show actual conflict with other uses of the name in question by actual articles in Wikipedia. I see no such basis provided in this request. --Born2cycle (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Rattlesnake Mountain is a set index article, not a disambiguation page. If none of the other 16 summits have a Wikipedia article, I would suggest that this article can remain here and the set index article (if needed) can be created at List of mountains named Badger Mountain or List of Badger Mountains. --JHunterJ (talk) 19:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actally unless one of the other Badger Mountains is significantly more notable, there is no need to disambiguate this page at all. The other one in Washington can simply be Badger Mountain (mountain range), where "mountain range" is the range it's in, or plateau if that applies; counties are not normally used for mountain disambiguations. The first article in any series of like-named article does not need disambiguation; only later articles do, and in the case where something else may be more important a change to a disambiguated form may be called for. Compare Firesteel River and Firesteel River (British Columbia) although numerous other examples come to mind (and in that case the province/state is the disambiguation because there are no others; if there were another in BC its disambiguation would be, say, Firesteel River (Columbia River), i.e. if that third Firesteel were a tributary of the Columbia.....Skookum1 (talk) 19:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And NB if this one does come to need disambiguation, say because Badger Mountain in West Virginia or wherever is more important, the disambiguation would be Badger Mountain (Columbia Plateau).Skookum1 (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I partially agree with JHunterJ's comments. notability or importance is much too subjective and very localised. i think Badger Mountain should be used as an index, and this peak should be disambiguated according to the guidelines set forth in Wikiproject Mountains naming conventions, which is: Badger Mountain (''political division''). --emerson7 18:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.