Talk:BMW M62

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Does anyone have BMW's dyno chart results for these engines? I have them for many of their newer engines but I haven't been able to track one down for any of these.

hm, it seems the 4.8 litre version is missing that was employed in the late first generation BMW X5...

oh, that one belongs to the N62 engines, sorry about that

- Sources needed -- please identify sources for specs and other information --

Morgan Aero 8 Engine[edit]

Does anyone know what engine is used in the Morgan Aero 8? I see that it was listed under the M62TUB44 section, but without a source. Each of the other listed articles list the engine as being used, but the Morgan article is silent on the issue. This engine could be a M62 or an N62. Can anyone back up what engine is used?? Nicholas SL Smith 01:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on BMW M62. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Nikasil/Alusil a Liner?[edit]

Should these process be referred to as cylinder liners or as a surface treatment? I am conflicted on this, when most readers think of cylinder liners they think of thick cast iron ones, however the silicon based process make what is effectively a molecular scale liner. What do you think? Toasted Meter (talk) 10:49, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, although they perform the same function as liners, they are quite different objects. Personally I think either "liner" or "coating" would be ok. For example here are some descriptions of the R35's plasma liners:1, 2, 3. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good, I think I will change it to coating so as to avoid confusion. And the plasma deposited cylinder coating is interesting. Toasted Meter (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent improvements. I didn't realise that Alusil was a different technique, so thanks for fixing that up. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 10:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]