Talk:Auth-Code

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Cleanup[edit]

This article is a mess. "Maybe complain"? Wikipedia isn't directly for handing out advice, perhaps this part could be more professionally written. --84.12.67.191 11:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 26th March 2007[reply]

I agree, tagged for cleanup. --Hm2k (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the article from scratch today. I couldn't even tell which parts of the old article were old terminology and which were just speculative. --Closeapple (talk) 07:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 February 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of objections (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer secret → Auth-Code – No evidence that "transfer secret" is in widespread use for those code; "EPP authorization code" is common if "Auth-Code" seems ambiguous. Closeapple (talk) 07:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.