Talk:Australian rules football schism (1938–1949)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interesting, but ...[edit]

... almost every single reference is made to primary sources, specifically digitised newspapers found on Trove. Secondary and tertiary sources are preferred on Wikipedia per WP:PSTS. As the policy says, "primary sources that have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them." What do football writers and historians have to say about the "schism"? - HappyWaldo (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting (and creative) interpretation of your own source, since the above paragraph makes it explicitly and unambiguously clear that mainstream newspapers are fine as sources. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They are still primary sources without the benefit of hindsight, peer review or thorough historical analysis. It would not be amiss to add the tag for too many primary sources: "As a general rule, primary sources include ... news reports and other documents dating from around the time of an event." The reliance on Trove can create narratives that haven't been recognised anywhere else. In the opening paragraph it reads, "In the context of VFA history, this period is often referred to as the throw-pass era." By whom? There are literally no hits for the "throw-pass era" on Google Books, and only scant references are made to the schism itself. - HappyWaldo (talk) 00:33, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian rules football schism (1938–1949). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Original research[edit]

This article seems to be original research on behalf of one author; I've never before seen the throw-pass era of the VFA characterised as a great schism in the game, and akin to the split between rugby union and rugby league. Rather, it was an interesting period in the long running rivalry between the two comps as the less popular VFA always sought to do things differently & go their own way as a business option to create interest in their comp. You could make a similar claim about the era when VFA teams had only 16 players. Aussie rules suffers from poor historical documentation & revisionism; this is an example of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.218.104 (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Australian_rules_football_schism_(1938–1949)&oldid=1199202374"