Talk:Austin K2/Y

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Austin K2/Y article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Trucks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Katy[edit]

K2 (KTwo) was affectively nicknamed "Katy", even after WWII, by US and Britt troopers in occupied Germany of the '50s.

Takima (talk) 21:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this included in "US soft-skinned vehicles"?[edit]

This vehicle is included in the category "US military soft-skinned vehicles of World War II". However, it was not designed, produced or procured by or for any of the the US military service branches, and I can find no evidence that it was used by the same, other than perhaps incidentally in the field. Can anyone explain its inclusion in this category? Bricology (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added by @Cavalryman: with this edit, perhaps they can explain. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 21:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having just checked, it seems that Cavalryman has not edited since apparently losing an argument here. I see no issue with removing the category, if someone comes up with a justification for its inclusion it can be added back in. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been used by USAAF (supplied under reverse lend lease) but that doesn't meant criteria for category inclusion, so I'd remove it.GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]