Talk:Audubon Canyon Ranch

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Audubon Canyon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070526174745/http://www.sfgate.com:80/getoutside/1996/may/acr.html to http://www.sfgate.com/getoutside/1996/may/acr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of article[edit]

This discussion has been disrupted by block evasion, ban evasion, or sockpuppetry from the following user:

VikingDrummer (talk · contribs · block log · spi · lta)

Comments from this user should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

The first line is about an organization but the Infobox protected area is used. The article can be about both but the lead and infobox should be consistent. I vote for protected area. Fettlemap (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~:The protected area is the most significant aspect here. The organization manages the protected area.VikingDrummer (talk) 08:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)~~ sock puppet of banned user - GizzyCatBella🍁 01:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]