This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
A fact from Atomic Blonde appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
shouldn't Wikipedia try not to ruin a film by sharing that Charlize Theron is the traitor that everyone is looking for within the cast list ??
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.22.92 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The claim that this movie "received generally positive reviews from critics, who praised its action sequences, Theron's and McAvoy's performances, and the soundtrack, although some criticized the writing and pacing" is not supported with a RS and not adequately reported in the article. Slightlymad 07:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There are various people who write introductions to film articles that claim to summarize the critical response, but they pay no attention whatsoever to what has actually been included in the critical response section below. It is possible that some critic someone may have praised McAvoy, and some critic somewhere might have complained about the pacing, making it vaguely plausible but far too often an editor has pulled it out of nowhere. What is supposed to be a summary often is selective and misleading and not really indicative of any broader trend in the reviews. Readers beware! -- 109.79.78.127 (talk) 23:12, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have the time to write this, but it seems odd that we don't have any info about the "oner" (the pseudo-single shot) action sequence. Here are some sources for an intrepid editor: IndieWire, Variety, GQ, Rolling Stone. —howcheng {chat} 04:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
