Talk:Asuka-dera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merge[edit]

Oppose -- In my view, the growth and development of further content is not likely to be enhanced by a merge at this time. Perhaps at some later date when one or both of the articles has been expanded, this issue could be re-visited. --Tenmei (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on partial mergers --- I understand the proposed moves are for individual sections within the Asuka-dera article. The present day Asuka-dera and Gango-ji's are totally independent therefore the removal of Gangō-ji section from Asuka-dera article is natural. Isshi Incident is a historical event that better be described in the article for its own, therefore the Isshi Incident section should be removed and merged to Isshi Incident article. The Asuka-dera article itself should survive and focus on its own description. Mantokun (talk) 06:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree --- I support edits proposed by Mantokun. This is arguably constructive. --Tenmei (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Asuka-dera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]